For love of your fellow man

 

Tony Blair may be on his way Hooray!!!!.

But!!!!!!!

As Blair is some one I believe was a CIA plant to change the Labour party!

Is that such a good thing, Or should we let him stay till the whole sorry mess of New Labour makes certain that the Socialist movement in Britain cannot be undermined again by the dumbing down of the peoples political will by promises of New Labour.

A thin veneer of nominal working class rhetoric over laying what is for the most part a wholesale transfer of Socialist politics of the labour party to the privatised capitalist economy of the post Thatcherite new Labour.

 

A position that will not change under the Chancellor Gordon Brown who is as much a new Labour man as Blair is.

We will just be seen to be not supporting George W so much. The policy’s will still continue till we are in the same sorry state as the USA in regard to health care and housing and such we will have the same degree of  poverty, gun crime and murder rate as they do.

 

The real alternative Would have been the Liberal Party.

 But Chassy K was outed for his Alcoholism a vice that Winston Churchill was held in high praise for.

The other two Hopefuls at the fall of Chass where outed for their gay activities again an attribute that I find endearing and very politically correct and should have been a winning point had we not got such a disagreeable press.

Of course that two people in question would have needed to be brave enough to have stood on the moral high ground of sexual freedom and not cowered in the shadows so much.

 

In my book any politician who is not bi -sexual should not be in government any way. Otherwise how can they possible represent the sexual diversity of the human beings. As indeed they should be Muslim /Jewish/ Christian/ catholic/ Buddhist/  pagan/ Hindu/ atheists to name but a few, to truly represent us all here in Britain.

Then they would all be truly Politically Correct.   

Many of us would also like to know from Tony before he goes what is the deal with George W?

 

Why did he decide to back him in the moves in the middle east without any real debate in parliament!

What was he offered or what was he threatened with?

Did it have any thing to do with funding new Labour?

Why was Dr. Kelly killed?.

Why did the USA do a demolition deal with Osama Bin Ladin over the Twin Towers? In the same way as I think Maggie did with the Ira aka the US construction industries. Over Manchester and other redevelopment sites around the UK its amazing what a bomb in Cannery Wharf did for real estate values and how many people moved in after .

 We all know you cant win a war on Terror.

Terrorism is after all the last resort of the disaffected against the the ruling class. As long as you have an oppressive ruling class there will always be people who have no option but to try and bring it do9wn by what ever means possible personally I prefer ridicule and humour so to out law cartons is not good. and to let people believe their religion is sacred is foolish to say the least. all religions are fair game for a laugh!

The best way to deal with terrorism is to invite them in and let them realise what they are missing out on by trying to put them selves in opposition Make them part of the statues quo and incoperate them into the larger community you will never totally irradiate them but you can at least give them a legitimate voice and by so doing curb their violent and destructive tendancys.